Process Mineralogy Today

A discussion resource for process mineralogy using todays technologies


MinAssist Privacy Policy

Privacy is important and we respect yours.

This policy sets out our privacy practices and how we handle information we may collect from or about you when you visit

What do we capture and what for?

You may choose to provide information such as email address, name, phone number, company and so forth to MinAssist in order to:

  • subscribe to the MinAssist Newsletter;
  • download resources like digital books; or
  • make an enquiry about MinAssist’s services.

This information is used by MinAssist to:

  • respond to enquiries originating from you.
  • add you to a mailing list for newsletters and other occasional email contact. You may request at any time to be removed from this list.
  • add your to our contacts database which may result in email, postal or telephone communication. You may request at any time to be removed from this list.

Google Analytics

MInAssist also uses Google Analytics, a web analytics service. Google Analytics uses cookies, web beacons, and other means to help MInAssit analyse how users use the site. For information about Google’s Privacy Policy please refer to

Sharing of Information

MinAssist may share information under the following circumstances:

  • legal requirement - courts, administrative agencies, or other government entities.
  • organisations that may provide services to us - where relevant we may need to share some of your information to companies we engage with (for example, accountants, lawyers, business advisors, marketing service providers, debt collection service providers, equipment providers). Note that these third parties are prohibited by law or by contract from processing personal information for purposes other than those disclosed in this Privacy Policy.
  • where the information is already in the public domain.
  • business sale or merger - where contact data may be passed to new owners.


At your request, we will provide you with reasonable access to your personal information, so that you can review what we have stored and, if you choose, request corrections to it. Please request access by writing to us at the address listed in the Contact Information section below.


MinAssist combines technical and physical safeguards with employee policies and procedures to protect your information. We will use commercially reasonable efforts to protect your information.

Links to Other Websites

When you click on a link on this website that takes you to a website operated by another company, you will be subject to that company’s privacy practices.


MinAssist may amend this Privacy Policy from time to time.

Enforcement, Dispute Resolution, and Verification

Please contact us with any questions or concerns related to this Privacy Policy by using the address listed in the Contact Information section below. We will investigate and attempt to resolve complaints or disputes regarding personal information.

Contact Information

If you have questions or concerns related to this Privacy Policy, you may contact us by email at

A Brief Overview of In-situ Recovery (ISR)


Over the past few years there has been a renewed interest in in-situ recovery methods for metals (ISR). The concept of ISR is by no means new and has been used successfully in the past, especially in the recovery of uranium. CSIRO Waterford in Perth has been leading ISR research efforts in Australia. Along with international collaborators the industry is working towards more extensive application of ISR methods for commodities such as copper. This article is a brief overview of ISR methods and practical considerations for its application.


I attended the recent ISR Symposium at the CSIRO Waterford research facility in Perth in June 2017. The program involved presentations from ISR veterans from the CSIRO, University of Western Australia, Curtin University, Heathgate Resources, and Excelsior Mining Corp. The key topics covered in the symposium included the economic drivers, social license to operate, and a wide range of technical aspects of ISR operations.

In-Situ Recovery is the process of recovering metal reserves by passing reactive fluids (lixiviant) through the ore deposit using a series of injection and extraction wells. The lixiviant moves through natural or artificially created fluid flow pathways, interacts with the ore minerals to scavenge the metals of interest, and returns those metals to surface for extraction from their dissolved form in the lixiviant. The example in figure 1 is from the Beverley uranium mine in South Australia, operated by Heathgate Resources.


Figure 1: A schematic showing the injection and extraction of lixiviant in the Beverley uranium deposit (from the World Nuclear Association).


In terms of Australian copper ISR prospects Terramin and their partner Environmental Copper Recovery (ECR) are working towards developing the historic Kapunda copper resource to extract an estimated 119 000 tons of copper (Barossa Herald). The remaining copper in the Kapunda resource, left in the ground because of inefficient mining and extraction methods, is unlikely to be economically viable using conventional mining techniques. Modern ISR methods and favourable economic factors have made the Kapunda resource an attractive exploration target and the operators are moving in a positive direction towards developing the site.


A continual theme of the ISR symposium was the social license to operate. Operating companies have recognised that without local community support ISR operations have limited chances to succeed, and they have therefore placed an emphasis on their community engagement efforts. Heathgate Resources highlighted the importance of disclosing critical science issues early in the social engagement process to demonstrate their trust in the community. Continual community involvement and science communication is key to the long term success of an ISR operation, especially in the light of the negative public opinion of shale gas operations and a general failure to communicate clearly, effectively, and honestly with the public. Using the Beverley mine as an example (figure 1) it is critical to highlight and demonstrate the impermeability of the confining clay formations above and below the ore horizon. These natural features help control lixiviant flow, clarify the optimum locations for surrounding monitoring wells, and provide an opportunity to efficiently identify and control spurious flow behaviour.


From an economic standpoint the argument for ISR is similar to what the oil and gas industry has posed for their interest in shale gas reserves, i.e. the easy-to-recover resources have already been found and exploited, often not very efficiently, modern target reserves are becoming increasingly complicated, and conventional mining techniques are often too expensive with unacceptable levels of environmental impact. ISR presents a more affordable alternative to conventional mining techniques with much lower early-stage capital outlay, and it delivers only a fraction of the environmental concern. Practical considerations often render ISR as the only option for resource extraction. Excelsior Mining explained how an interstate highway and railway line located on top of their underground resource at Gunnison, Arizona, USA, left them with no other choice but to use ISR. Having now run the operation for several years they confirmed a more favourable rate of return, even when commodity prices are low.


The environmental considerations and risks of ISR are fairly clear. It does not require a large surface footprint for moving and dumping enormous volumes of ore and waste material, which makes it an extraction method with remarkably low environmental impact. However, a key aspect is to demonstrate hydrogeological control over the injected lixiviant. This necessitates a firm understanding of the local and regional groundwater systems, and the need for a series of monitoring wells, especially in the direction of groundwater resources intended for human or agricultural use.


In more complicated deposits the mineral characteristics are key factors in ISR efficiency. The presence of lixiviant-neutralising minerals such as calcite and dolomite can significantly increase the volume of lixiviant required to offset the loss in recovery, which in turn drives up the cost of the operation. Additionally, dynamic fluid-rock interactions, which are driven by mineralogy and lixiviant chemistry, may have detrimental effects on the fluid flow efficiency and recovery. It is therefore critical to consider carefully the nature of the resource mineralogy and plan the operation accordingly. The challenges of fines migration are well-known in the oil and gas industry where the mobilisation of clay minerals such as kaolinite and illite often alter the fluid flow behaviour of a reservoir by bridging the narrow connecting channels (throats) between pores.


Figure 2: Clay mobilisation causing blockage of connecting pore throats and altering fluid flow behaviour (Sameni et al, 2015).


ISR presents an exciting opportunity for the mining industry. Keep your eyes peeled for upcoming articles where we explore some of the technical aspects of ISR.

Share On LinkedIn

About the Author: Pieter Botha

Previous Arrow Back to all posts

Follow Blog

Subscribe to the MinAssist Newsletter group and receive notifications of new Process Mineralogy Today blog posts.

We promise not to spam you and we'll keep your email safe and secure. MinAssist may send you occassional email correspondence but you can unsubscribe at any time.